This was a movement which sprang up in the Church of England
in the early Victorian era, bent on restoring the Catholic side of the Anglican
heritage. Many clergymen at the time
went over to Rome, because of conservative policiatlal and religious
views. They felt that the Church of
England had lost its heritage, and that as a state church, it was bound to be
affected by the politics of the time, which they saw as frighteningly
radical. Others felt that it was possible
to revitalise and re dignify the Church of England, remaining in it and
reforming it. They attracted hostility
form “Low church” people, because of their desire to bring in “Catholic”
ritual, vestments and practices, such as the use of candles and incense... Many
Anglicans and English people in general were very hostile, traditionally to
Roman Catholicism and this extended to the increase in Catholic practices
within the Anglican Church.
But the movement grew and while it did tend to attract ultra
conservative people, it did have a positive side. The colour and beauty of the ritual was felt
to attract people, especially working class people. Charlotte was the daughter of William Yonge, a country
gentleman and was brought up and educated by him. He was an intelligent but strict man and while
she learned a lot from him, she also was somewhat limited, by her close
relationship with him. He was domineering
and she looked up to him, and felt it was her duty to be an obedient daughter.
She was an intelligent young woman but was afraid to think for herself. She felt that women might be clever – but the
cleverest woman knew she should be modest about her intelligence and use it
under male guidance. It has been said that she never married because she could never
find a man who matched up to her father.
Charlotte met with John Keble, one of the most famous of the
early generation of Anglo Catholic clergymen.
He became a “Pope” to her, an
inspiration and guide. She began to
write novels and used them to promote the Anglo catholic movement. She was a novelist of family life, she also
wrote children’s books, histories and historical novels.
Her strict religious views and her deep conservative
rigidity probably prevented her from being a great novelist, but she was a very
good one.In her time, very moralistic novels were popular, as people had high ideals. so her better ones, like Daisy Chain, Pillars of the House, Clever woman of the Family, etc., were all read by all sorts of people and loved. She did portray people who might seem improbably virtuous, and her views on women were old fashioned even in the later Victorian age. But she could write realistic and lovable children, growing up, like Ethel, in Daisy Chain… I haven’t read all her works but I do enjoy some of them. She’s not really my usual type of writer because she is very moralistic, but she’s an interesting character. And at times it is nice to read about high ideals.
She also wrote a fairly competent history of names
ReplyDeleteI've never read it, Might try and find a copy
Delete