Sunday, 31 July 2016
Julia, Theatre, a novel by Somerset Maugham
I picked this novel up a few years ago, and then saw a dreadful film adaptation of it, called “Being Julia”. I liked the novel as a short and an easy pleasant read. However, on the negative side, while I don’t expect all characters in a book to be lovable, a book with no likable
characters can be a bit off putting. There's no-one that I can approve of, and they are only mildly interesting to me. Julia is an actress who "acts all the time"... and Maugham seems to agree with her son that really Julia doesn't exist. She was wildly in love with her
husband Michael, when they met, but then she fell out of love with him, and began to see his character as dull, complacent, cheap and pompous.
Within a few years of marriage, she's bored with him and has gone off sex with him. She has a son, Roger, but he doesn't seem to mean much to her. He later tells her that she only ever saw him, (the son) as a pretty little boy she could be photographed with, and it is hard to disagree with him about this. She never seems like a mother at all. Julia's predicaments are amusing, but even when she is unhappy it is hard to feel sorry for her.
She falls in love with a much younger man, and they have an affair, which gives her a lot of pleasure and thrills. Yet even with this man, it is hard to see real affection. She buys him things and gives him money, but when he begins to grow a bit tired of the affair, she very nastily makes him realise that he is her "kept boy" and that she has power over him.
She then finds that he has been seeing other women, younger ones...and has been boasting of how she "eats out of his hand". He's not a very nice character either, but Julia then takes a revenge on his new girlfriend, a young actress who is working with her. It is hard to like anyone in the book and while there is plenty to laugh at, there is a feeling that one's usually laughing at the characters rather than with them. Julia is devoted to her acting and we see her, having shrugged off her infatuation for Tom, her young lover, planning to play Hamlet...It’s nice to see a woman who isn't all the time depending on male admiration or affection but she is cold at heart and vulgar. Maugham claims to be fond of her, but the novel makes me feel a vulgar strain in his nature..I liked his play The Constant Wife, but this seems to show the other side of Maugham.. the catty side.. which seems to dislike women…
Wednesday, 27 July 2016
Constant Wife Somerset Maugham
I went to the Gate Theatre, Dublin, and enjoyed a performance of “The Constant Wife” by Somerset Maugham. It was an attractive “well-made play”, with an interesting theme, good acting, costumes and set design. Kudos to the cast and director, who managed to do accents, and who managed to make the characters sound a little affected, but not to the point where they become overdone and irritating. I find the older I get, the more I prefer a “middle range” play. I like something that is not full of intellectual discussion or “deep and meaningful themes” but a play that covers a subject, has some witty and clever lines but does not pretend to be more than it is.
“Constant Wife” is quite a daring play for its time. Constance, the wife of a successful Harley Street doctor, has time on her hands. She has no real work, with her servants running the house. Her husband is often unfaithful and his latest affair is with one of her friends. Well-meaning friends and relatives nag at her, advising her to confront her husband - but she doesn’t wish to do this.
An old boyfriend of hers has just returned to England, after living abroad for some time. Constance has a platonic friendship with him, which her husband does not mind about. She does not feel able to confront her husband because she does not feel she is on an equal footing with him. She is depending on him financially. While in theory, as a wife, most people would say that her work of running his home and rearing children gives her the right to consider herself his equal, and to speak up to him, but, she does not feel that it does.
Constance is willing to admit that for a modern middle class wife, there isn’t much to do. Servants run the house, labour saving devices make this much easier than it used to be. Nurses and schools take care of the children and helping to run her husband’s social life is not that demanding. Maugham had a rather ambiguous attitude to women and sometimes was hostile to daring and sexually free ones, but in Constant Wife, he has Constance bravely acknowledge her lack of “equality” within the marriage.
When her girlfriend’s husband finally gets suspicious that his wife is having an affair with Constance’s husband, the resourceful “constant wife” cleverly covers up. She suggests that the couple go away for a while to mend their marriage. While they are away, Constance makes a decision, and having refused a friend’s offer to give her a job in interior decorating, she now decides to take up the work. Over a year or so, she earns money at the job, and begins to feel that now she is on an equal footing with her husband. She tells him that she has put money in his bank account, from what she has earned. That will pay for her keep for the past year. So now, she gives him a polite hint that she’s going away with her old admirer. They will be discreet about it, but she means to engage in an affair. And he can’t really say anything. She has supported herself for the past year, with the money she made on her job... (Syrie Maugham, Maugham's wife was a very successful interior designer).
Constance tells her husband that she is not surprised that he has grown bored with her sexually. Just because he wanted to sleep with her years ago, that does not mean that he is going to feel the same sexual passion for the rest of his life. The final scene where Constance tells her husband that she will be a “constant wife” if not a faithful one, where he is rather annoyed but
in fairness, can’t say very much, is funny. Maugham is insistent that if women want independence, they have to work for it... Then they can have the sexual freedom and general independence that men have usually had….a refreshingly sensible moderate point of view which does not lean towards feminism or “male chauvinism”! I enjoyed the play very much and would love to see more Maugham plays being done.
Friday, 22 July 2016
Georgette Heyer's novels Part II
Heyer’s earlier works were more adventure stories, later she turned more to comedies of manners. The first books written in her 20s were set in Georgian England. This time had something of a “Wild West” feel about it - there were highwaymen, lawlessness and it wasn’t unknown for noblemen to kidnap heiresses and force them into marriage or to take young working class girls forcibly as mistresses. Heyer used these facts in order to put together good rollicking adventure stories, such as Black Moth, where the lovely Diana is kidnapped by a wealthy nobleman who wants to marry her.
However Tracy does not care if he has to force her into the marriage, and he is willing to rape her. She is rescued by John Carstares, another nobleman. Carstares had to leave England for some years, due to taking the blame for cheating at cards. He has lived abroad, and then come back to England, and lived as a highwayman…Eventually he saves Diana’s virtue, and his brother, who had been the one who cheated, takes the blame. Jack is restored to his earldom and family estate with his new wife.
"These Old Shades” has a plot where Justin Alistair, a selfish and rakish man of 40, meets a young street urchin who turns out to be the daughter of his enemy, the Comte De St Vire. He takes Leonie into his household, as his page since she has been dressing as a boy, to avoid molestation. Justin hopes to use her to shame St Vire, but he falls in love with her and marries her.
The stories are good, if improbable, and even then Heyer was working towards what became her trademark, witty banter, using period slang, and convoluted and comical plotting… She usually had a few young men of the kind that PG Wodehouse called “drones”, in her novels. These are idle but good natured young men who spend their time amusing themselves but do not do any harm to anyone. Their lively conversation, misunderstandings and good natured banter are fun to read, and as Heyer matured as a writer, she began to produce more of these characters rather than dastardly villains and heroes. Another trope of hers was the bored young society wife who has a rather dull husband whom she loves, but who seeks amusement, with livelier men as companions. As her writing developed, she was able to write plots that had no particular villain and no elopements, gaming debts, abductions or duels.
Her stories moved on to social comedy, about a young woman having her social debut, and learning how to navigate her way through Society and to find a husband. Occasionally, the plot involves a “fake betrothal”, where a couple pretend to be engaged. Or in some cases, a couple marry for reasons of convenience and then discover that they are in love.In her last novels, her heroines are older than the debutante age, and are usually young women well into their twenties, who have been out in society for some time but have not found a man whom they wished to marry. They often have a role as mother substitute to younger siblings or a niece. So her heroines matured from “young and rather silly and naïve” to more intelligent and practical, as she herself grew older and her writing became deeper and more serious.
Friday, 15 July 2016
Georgette Heyer Part I
Georgette Heyer, queen of Regency novelists, inventor of the genre, was born in Wimbledon in 1902. She was from a middle class family, not very rich, but like most middle class people of the time, very status conscious. She had a good education, but like most girls, she did not attend university.
She always wanted to be a writer, and in her teens she wrote the story that became her first historical romance, “The Black Moth." It was set in Georgian England and was typical of her early work in that it had rather “archaic” language, culled from other novelists such as Baroness Orczy and Jeffery Farnol. It was highly adventurous, with duels, drama, card games for high stakes, and a villain who kidnaps the heroine, intending to force her to marry him. It is less historically accurate than most of her later works. She was very young, and she concerned herself mostly with writing a good rollicking story to amuse her young brother who was ill. A few years later, she revised the story and it was published as her first novel.
For such a young writer, it was quite an achievement. It isn’t as polished and good as her later
novels, but it is still very readable.
Her family were far from rich and she needed to earn a living. She had friends, including Carola Oman and Joanna Cannan, (both of whom were successful novelists); who also planned to write for a living. Writing had become a respectable career for a middle class girl…or even an upper class woman in need of money. One didn’t need formal training or a university education, and it was work which could be done after marriage. Her father who had taught at Kings College, London, had ensured she had been well educated, for her time. She had also met with other young women who had similar interests.
“Black Moth” was a success, and she went on writing and for some years, she produced different sorts of novels. She wrote 4 contemporary novels based on her “real life", in everyday society. She later removed these from publication. As a young woman, she was attractive, not conventionally pretty, but dark and smart-looking and she enjoyed a social life. As she grew older, she became almost reclusive, except for the sort of social events that were expected from the wife of a professional man. In 1925, she married Ronald Rougier, a mining engineer.
Her beloved father died suddenly just before the wedding. But her marriage was a success. She and Ronald were married for almost 50 years and were devoted to each other. However, he was not rich and she went on with her writing, to help him financially. Some years into their marriage, he decided to give up his work, and train for the Bar. Georgette became the main wage earner and supported them during his training. She also had brothers who were not very successful with money and found herself helping them out financially as well. She loved her work but she undoubtedly began to feel that she was over burdened. She gradually became more reclusive, and refused to do any PR for her books. She felt that her private life was private and that it was not necessary to give interviews or talk about herself, in order to sell her works.
When her husband qualified as a barrister, he had social commitments that he had to comply with, relating to his Bar work. Georgette was willing to do these, but she seems to have withdrawn from most other socialising. Always conservative minded, she became more right wing. She didn’t care for the Welfare State, feeling that she worked very hard, and brought a lot of money into the UK, only for the government to take it and waste it on social programmes. She had a son, Richard, in 1932 - her only child -and tried to ensure that he had a good education. He later followed his father into the legal profession.
In addition to her financial commitments to help her family, she was personally rather extravagant and not very good with managing money. She was often hit with tax bills that meant she had to write something in a hurry to pay a bill. She wrote several detective stories the 1920s and 30s. She gave up writing them when she was more financially secure. She used her husband for advice on the legal side and the collaboration was a lot less successful than with her historical works. However the detective novels were reasonably popular and sold well. Her romances sold much better.
Heyer’s first novels were set mainly in Georgian times, and were rather like the Black Moth, in having dastardly villains. They are built around events such as abductions, duels, quarrels, and people pretending to be someone else, or even “swapping gender”. In The Masqueraders, Robin and Prudence Tremayne, brother and sister, are on the run because of his participation in the Jacobite Rising, and they have to disguise themselves, to avoid detection. Robin, who is small and slim, poses as a woman, Kate and Prudence, a sturdily built girl, is Peter.
There are other times in early Heyer where her leading lady dresses and poses as a boy, Penelope in “The Corinthian” and Leonie, In “These Old Shades”. Heyer was a somewhat “male oriented” woman, preferring masculine company... she enjoyed being with her brothers and her husband, and her father, though she did have some close female friends. In her early writings, she disguised some of her female characters as boys, so that they could have more freedom to “roam around and have adventures”. Later books abandoned this sort of plot, and her women were more realistic. Even if they had masculine interests such as riding or shooting, they had their fair share of feminine wiles and were usually good housekeepers.
Tuesday, 12 July 2016
Jean Plaidy
Jean Plaidy was one of the most prolific and well known historical novelists, who wrote a large body of light fiction, mostly covering the royal families of England and Europe. However she was born in modest circumstances in Canning Town, East London, in 1906.
Her birth name was Eleanor Alice Burford. In spite of her coming from a very ordinary family, she had a good education. Her family sent her to a private school, since health problems meant she could not attend school full time. At 16, she went to business college to learn to type... and then started work at various jobs, including selling gems in Hatton Gardens, and translating for foreign tourists.
There is no biography for her, as yet, but photographs show her as an attractive young woman. She was in her early 20s when she married Joseph Hibbert, a man many years her senior, who had children from a previous marriage. He was a businessman. Her marriage was a lasting and happy one and it gave her financial security, to try her hand at writing.
She wrote several novels before she hit on something that sold and then began to write various types of historical fiction. She used different pseudonyms, such as Philippa Carr for her “Daughters of England” series, and Victoria Holt for Gothic romances. She also wrote thrillers and crime fiction, but it was her Gothics and historical works that made her famous.
Her first Gothic, Mistress of Mellyn, wove elements of previous novels such as Jane Eyre and “Rebecca” by Daphne Du Maurier. Plaidy had started off with serious modern novels, which were very long, but none of them attracted a publisher. As the 1930s progressed, she turned to more saleable works, including romantic fiction and light works. She wrote 10 novels for Mills and Boon. She was becoming a successful writer.
In the 1940s during the War, she and her husband lived in Cornwall where she was able to write, and she lived near Plaidy Beach which gave her her most famous pen name. Like Georgette Heyer, Plaidy could claim to be the founder of a new type of historical novel. Heyer invented the Regency romance; Plaidy was more general. Many of her works concentrate on Queens of England or France.
One of the first of her books that I read as a teenager was “Murder Most Royal” which was a novel of Anne Boleyn and her younger cousin Catherine Howard. Later on, Plaidy wrote novels about both queens, using more recent historical research. Like Heyer, she didn’t have a university education, but she was intelligent and a good writer and able to incorporate her research into her novels, without “dumping” it into the books, too much.
I get the feeling that she tended to rely on more conservative sources and at times too, she was anachronistic in how she perceived her characters, judging them from a modern point of view. She had a vehement prejudice against Henry VIII because of the “way he treated his wives”. She was hard working and prolific as a writer, usually dedicating 5 hours a day to her work even in old age. She usually went on a cruise in the winter, as she grew older, to get away from the cold English winter. She would work each day, for a fixed time, then play chess.
After her husband’s death – which was a great sadness to her, she settled in Kensington London, with a woman companion sharing her flat. She used the large Kensington central library, with its collection of old books, for research, and was allowed to take books home and kept them as long as she liked. She still worked very hard, and produced 91 Jean Plaidy novels alone.
She died in 1993, on a cruise, in the Mediterranean, having had a long and successful life and writing career. I wish that there was a biography of her, and hope that one will come out soon.
Some of her work seems rather dated now, but she started me wanting to write and gave me my obsession with Anne Boleyn!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)